Exploring the Interconnectedness Between Public Administration, Legislative Systems, and Criminal Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Malaysia and Indonesia
Abstract:
Legislative systems, public administration, and criminal justice systems are deemed essential for developing an effective governance system. Individuals' rights to safety and protection are ensured through maintaining law and order in the country, which these elements are responsible for providing. In addition, the interrelationships between public administration, legislative systems, and criminal justice in Malaysia and Indonesia are the subject of this study. This study employed a "standard legal research" methodology, and both primary and secondary sources were used to compile data. Consequently, following the acquisition of qualitative data, content analysis was performed. According to this study's findings, Indonesia and Malaysia are Muslim countries; however, Malaysia adheres to Islamic Sharia principles, whereas Indonesia employs a civil law system. Malaysia utilizes a federal system, whereas Indonesia uses a unitary system. The "1945 Constitution of Indonesia" and the "Constitution of the Federation of Malay" also include distinct laws and regulations to protect the people's rights against criminal offenses. In this context, additional laws and regulations include "the Panel Code," "The Dangerous Drugs Act of 1952," "The Food Act of 1983," KUHAP, and others. Therefore, it has been suggested that the communication and collaboration between legislators, public administration officials, and criminal justice agencies should be strengthened to devise crucial laws and policies to advance criminal justice. In addition, essential amendments to the associated constitutions are required for effective outcomes.
Keyword:
Public Administration; Legislative Systems; Criminal Justice; Malaysia; Indonesia